Statistics of the health crisis

January 15, 2017

The word crisis is often over-used, but the NHS is facing a genuine crisis in which its component parts are struggling with the amount of work they face and the financial and human resources which they have at their disposal. A House of Commons Briefing Paper, NHS Indicators: England January 2017, shows the scale of the crisis engulfing the NHS.

  1. Amalgamating health and social care services has long been spoken of as an objective, in the light of the so-called ‘bed-blocking’ phenomenon; largely elderly people deemed fit enough to leave hospital but who cannot be accommodated with support in their home or a care-home. Yet this objective is impossible in a situation where both the NHS and care services are under-funded. The connection and feedback with the social care crisis is reflected in the 26% increase in delayed transfers of patients from hospitals from November 2015 to November 2016. Delay because of the inability to provide care at home or in a nursing home increased by 47%. In the twelve months to November 2016 there were 2.12 million ‘delayed days’ when patients who should have been released were still in a hospital bed. This was 22% higher than in the 12 months to November 2015. Over this period, delays where the NHS was at least partially responsible rose by 15%, and those where social care organisations were at least partially responsible rose by 35%. In October 2016 there was a daily average of 3,692 delays attributable to the NHS, 2,249 to social care, and 515 to both.

    (To read on download a PDF here nhsindicatorsarticle )


Disenfranchising the electors of Eldene & Liden

January 6, 2017

Swindon Council is ruled by anti-democratic clique. They have imposed new parish councils on non-parished areas without any democratic mandate whatsoever and against considerable opposition. They have set a ridiculous deadline with the new parishes having to agree a precept by the end of January. The borough councillors in these areas were presented with a dilemma; to become shadow parish councillors and to set the first precept for parishes which they opposed setting up in the absence of a democratic mandate, or else the Tories would have imposed their placemen/women to set a precept. This is bad enough but in Nythe the situation is even worse, In the two areas with which it will be amalgamated, the electors of Eldene and Liden will even be denied the right to be represented by their elected Borough councillors as others will.

When the October 19th Cabinet passed a document relating to the changes, it said it would “Agree to the recommendations set out in Appendix 5”. This Appendix referred to “the new parish” which would comprise Nythe, plus Eldene and Liden. The “new parish” would be divided into two wards, with 7 parish councillors in Nythe, and 8 in Eldene and Liden. Read the rest of this entry »


Israel cannot be both a ‘Jewish state’ and a democratic one

January 6, 2017

So the settler agenda is defining the future of Israel. And their stated purpose is clear. They believe in one state: greater Israel. In fact, one prominent minister, who heads a pro-settler party, declared just after the U.S. election – and I quote – “the era of the two-state solution is over,” end quote. And many other coalition ministers publicly reject a Palestinian state. And they are increasingly getting their way, with plans for hundreds of new units in East Jerusalem recently announced and talk of a major new settlement building effort in the West Bank to follow.” John Kerry

The decision of the USA at the United Nations not to apply their veto on the resolution critical of Israeli settlements on the West Bank was denounced by the Israeli government as “a disgraceful anti-Israel manoeuvre”. The resolution called on Israel to “immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied territory, including East Jerusalem”. According to the Israeli government it is the resolution rather than the continued expansion of settlements which is “an obstacle to peace”. The UN resolution it seems was a response to a Bill going though the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament) which will retrospectively ‘legalise’ illegal building on Palestinian owned land. Areas where settlements were built by Israelis “in good faith…and were even encouraged or built in coordination with the state”, unaware that it is was privately owned land, apparently need to be “regulated”. The destruction of these settlements “is liable to seriously, unjustifiably harm those who have lived there for many years”. They stole somebody else’s land but heck, they didn’t realise it. It was just sitting there on the West Bank. How can you penalise them for this ‘mistake’? The harm to the owners, of course, does not merit a mention.

Naftali Bennett, leader of the Jewish Home party, and Education Minister in the Netanyahu government, had no doubt about the implication of the proposed regulation. He hailed it as the first step towards annexing West Bank land for Israel. (Read on below or download a PDF here jewishanddemocratic) Read the rest of this entry »


The Great Western Hospital and the “beds crisis”

December 23, 2016

You didn’t need a premonition in 1999 (“We warned this would happen says pensioner over beds crisis at GWH”, Swindon Advertiser) to know that the new hospital would be short of beds. Swindon TUC helped set up an NHS Defence Campaign which cut through the propaganda of the Trust management to show that the new hospital would only have 483 in-patient beds, as compared to 703 in the various hospitals at their disposal before GWH was built. (See an article I wrote in the Swindon Advertiser evening-advertiser-article )

The new hospital was opened in December 2002, and within one month it was in difficulties. The Advertiser on the 6th January 2003 declared “No room at the hospital”. The Trust wrote to GPs pleading with them not to admit emergency patients in the light of the “untenable” bed situation at the hospital. “Unfortunately every trolley, bed and bed space is in use currently. It is extremely difficult to find spaces to examine patients.” Read the rest of this entry »


Park Library kept open, but…

December 1, 2016

Park Library is to remain open and funded by Swindon Council. This is a success for our campaign which raised 1200 signatures calling on the council to amend their proposal to include Park in the core Library service. Better open than closed. Yet the council is only funding 15 staffed hours a week. This is clearly not enough. Parks & East Walcot Community Forum will therefore be seeking to persuade the new parish council, which is being imposed on us, to provide funding to extend the staffed hours. We will be writing to the councillors who will make up the shadow parish council in our area to ask them to provide funding so that there is a service available which more accurately reflects the needs of local people. We know this won’t be straight-forward. However, we are concerned about young people who currently use the library to do their homework after school hours, and the threat to other services currently provided in our library.

Parks & East Walcot Community Forum has proposed a meeting between councillors and community organisations to discuss the setting up of the new parish, what the precept will be, what services it might support. Local communities should be involved in discussion on these questions before a precept is set. We will raise the question of support for Park Library in those discussions. Read the rest of this entry »


The local government funding crisis and how to resolve it

November 11, 2016

With the election of Jeremy Corbyn as Labour leader for the second time we have been told that this has consolidated Labour as the “anti-austerity party”. Whilst this is certainly the aspiration of Jeremy and his supporters Labour can only be judged on what it does not just what it says. The election of a left wing leader cannot transform the Labour Party in and of itself. Many of the old guard whose politics are rooted in those of New Labour are still entrenched. After the Parliamentary Party Labour councillors were the section of the party where support for Corbyn was at its lowest and resistance to a break from the politics of New Labour at its highest. Labour in office in local government is anything but an anti-austerity party. Nationally Labour has, as yet, made no attempt to build a movement against the government’s austerity programme. It has not even attempted to assemble its local authorities to discuss organising resistance to central government’s assault on local government. Each authority is therefore left to its own devices to attempt at best to manoeuvre in the face of unprecedented cuts or at worst to simply administer them without question. We therefore see the spectacle of Labour authorities cutting services, closing Libraries, outsourcing leisure services, and in some areas attacking the wages and conditions of staff. In Derby and Durham they are cutting the wages of low paid teaching assistants, precipitating strike action by a group workers who have no history of militancy. In Durham a Labour council is proposing to issue redundancy notices aimed at forcing staff to sign up to new contracts which involve as much as a 23% cut in wages1. (Read on below or download a PDF here localgovfundingcrisis ) Read the rest of this entry »


Park Library petition – Catch 22 Swindon style

November 5, 2016

Swindon Council has refused to table Parks and East Walcot Community Forum’s petition for discussion at the November council meeting. The petition, which has more than 1,100 signatures, calls on the council to amend their proposal to include Park Library in the core provision of the new Library service. Both the committees section and the Lead Member were told that we wanted the petition discussed at the November meeting. We also informed the Lead Member that we intended to put in a copy to the consultation as well. We did not receive the courtesy of a reply from her.

The head of the so-called Democratic Services has refused to take the petition at the November meeting on the grounds that we gave a copy of the petition into the Libraries consultation together with our submission. What sense would it have made not to let them know more than 1,100 people were supporting our suggested amendment to their proposals, and have it recorded in their report? Read the rest of this entry »


%d bloggers like this: